This approach was commonplace until the 1970s, when American expert Richard Walsh popularized his Western Scientific bidding system. With less than game-forcing strength, Walsh espoused bypassing the
Holding 4+ diamonds and a 4-card major, responder should bid the major first. It’s important to show the major first and foremost, because responder might not have the strength to bid again.
East![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Bid 1.
East![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Bid 1. When holding 4-4 majors, show the hearts first. You can still locate a spade fit if partner rebids
.
How "extreme" to take the Walsh philosophy is a matter of partnership agreement. For instance, some pairs might bypass 6 strong diamonds to bid 4 weak spades... and some might not.
East![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
...Do you really want to bid ?
With game-forcing strength, responder can afford to bid his diamond suit first, and rebid his major next.
East![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Bid 1. You’re willing to reverse and show your hearts later.
Why play Walsh? First, you can find a major suit fit faster. This can be important when the opponents compete.
North | ||||
![]() | ||||
![]() | ||||
West | ![]() | East | ||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
![]() | ![]() | |||
![]() | South | ![]() | ||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
![]() | ||||
![]() | ||||
![]() |
West 1 ![]() 3 ![]() |
North Pass 3 ![]() |
East 1 ![]() 4 ![]() |
South 2 ![]() |
East bids .
Another ironic benefit of Walsh is the occasional chance of jamming the opponents yourself. Check out this deal:
North | ||||
![]() | ||||
![]() | ||||
West | ![]() | East | ||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
![]() | ![]() | |||
![]() | South | ![]() | ||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
![]() | ||||
![]() | ||||
![]() |
West 1 ![]() 1NT |
North Pass |
East 1 ![]() |
South Pass |
If East bids
Note that in ACBL games, Walsh responses are not alertable. However, the "Frequently bypass 4+ "
When the auction begins : 1
,
First - in his fine book "Modern Constructive Bidding", Marshall Miles advocates against opening
Second, responder is guaranteed to bid again with a 4-card major and game-forcing values. Therefore, it’s more economical and preemptive for opener to bid 1NT directly with balanced shape.
Examples:
North | ||||
![]() | ||||
![]() | ||||
West | ![]() | East | ||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
![]() | ![]() | |||
![]() | South | ![]() | ||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
![]() | ||||
![]() | ||||
![]() |
West 1 ![]() 1NT2 |
North Pass Pass |
East 1 ![]() Pass3 |
South Pass |
|
North | ||||
![]() | ||||
![]() | ||||
West | ![]() | East | ||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
![]() | ![]() | |||
![]() | South | ![]() | ||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
![]() | ||||
![]() | ||||
![]() |
West 1 ![]() 1NT2 2NT |
North Pass Pass Pass |
East 1 ![]() 2 ![]() 3NT |
South Pass Pass All Pass |
|
In the two auctions above, 1NT is alertable because of the ambiguity of opener's major suit length.
Note also that West could rebid
2023 © Jeff Tang. All Rights Reserved.